Piltdown Hoax
The
Piltdown man is a one of the most famous hoax that present bone fragments
showing the fossilized of an unknown early human. It start in England with a
group of collectors, which consist of Charles Dawson, Arthur Smith, Woodward,
Elliot smith, F.O. Barlow, Arthur Keith, W.P. Pycraft, and Sir Ray Lankester.
The group creates forgery pieces of bone to present as a skull of a fully
developed modern human. Which suppose to help scientist understand the human
evolution until it was exposed as a forgery 40 years later. The hoax was
discovered by scientific investigation because the fossil show inconsistent
pattern of hominid evolution and later show by testing the bone itself with the
fluorine content of fossil and roughly estimate the date of the fossil and it
show that the age of the fossil were really young. This help scientist see that
the fossil could be forgery, this show the important that they need more test
to prove that it actually if it’s forgery.
After understanding
more about the Piltdown man hoax it present a very interest idea about
scientist being curious, creative, and persistent. I find that it is really
interesting. That scientist developed a way which help testing everything and
make sure that every data they collect match and be useful for the next
experiment to come. But being human scientist are at fault also. What if the
forgery that have been made hold some of the useful information that help with
the evolution process but people discard them because it was a forgery. If scientist make a step back and take a look
at it instead of disregard of it all they may find something useful in it.
Which would be identifying as “There is no missing link” since there are an
indefinite number of missing branches and each of them can connect to many
different branches.
But
even all that scientific process help discover the flaw of the Piltdown man
hoax and the scientific process responsible for revealing the fraud is the
scientific method. The scientific method is first to “ask a question”, second is to do “background research”, third
is to construct a hypothesis, fourth is to test hypothesis with experiment,
fifth is to analyze the data and come up with a conclusion, lastly report the
result and see if your hypothesis were correct of not. I find this tool to be
what help scientist receive the most correct data. Especially Do background
research definitely help providing accurate information about the Piltdown
skull and help scientist figure out the forgery to help create a correct data.
In the
Piltdown man hoax has present a very important flaw of the human factor not
just scientist but human individual. Some people want fame and glory, some
people want to find the truth and some do it for the money. I believe that
scientific method is very important development that help reduce the chance of
errors like this to happen again. But also human factor are very important to
science because without fame, glory, truth, or money. Many people won't have
motivation to find what is important. This is what make science very
interesting. As a life lesson is it is important to verified the sources before
publish the data to present the truth and won't have to find out 40 years later
to fix the problems.